<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Andrew Ruef on The Trail of Bits Blog</title><link>https://miscreants.github.io/blog.trailofbits.com/authors/andrew-ruef/</link><description>Recent content in Andrew Ruef on The Trail of Bits Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:25:50 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://miscreants.github.io/blog.trailofbits.com/authors/andrew-ruef/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Using Static Analysis and Clang To Find Heartbleed</title><link>https://miscreants.github.io/blog.trailofbits.com/2014/04/27/using-static-analysis-and-clang-to-find-heartbleed/</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:25:50 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://miscreants.github.io/blog.trailofbits.com/2014/04/27/using-static-analysis-and-clang-to-find-heartbleed/</guid><description>Background Friday night I sat down with a glass of Macallan 15 and decided to write a static checker that would find the Heartbleed bug. I decided that I would write it as an out-of-tree clang analyzer plugin and evaluate it on a few very small functions that had the spirit of the Heartbleed bug […]</description></item><item><title>Semantic Analysis of Native Programs with CodeReason</title><link>https://miscreants.github.io/blog.trailofbits.com/2014/02/23/semantic-analysis-of-native-programs-introducing-codereason/</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:59:13 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://miscreants.github.io/blog.trailofbits.com/2014/02/23/semantic-analysis-of-native-programs-introducing-codereason/</guid><description>Have you ever wanted to make a query into a native mode program asking about program locations that write a specific value to a register? Have you ever wanted to automatically deobfuscate obfuscated strings? Reverse engineering a native program involves understanding its semantics at a low level until a high level picture of functionality emerges. […]</description></item><item><title>Ending the Love Affair with ExploitShield</title><link>https://miscreants.github.io/blog.trailofbits.com/2012/10/29/ending-the-love-affair-with-exploitshield/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:36:24 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://miscreants.github.io/blog.trailofbits.com/2012/10/29/ending-the-love-affair-with-exploitshield/</guid><description>ExploitShield has been marketed as offering protection “against all known and unknown 0-day day vulnerability exploits, protecting users where traditional anti-virus and security products fail.” I found this assertion quite extraordinary and exciting! Vulnerabilities in software applications are real problems for computer users worldwide. So far, we have been pretty bad at providing actual technology […]</description></item></channel></rss>